Claire Ward
Watford Labour Party

270 St Albans Road, Watford WD24 6PE

Claire Ward Labour MP for Watford

Join Labour
Lib Dem Watch
Clegg to ditch long-standing party policies

Wednesday, 22 July 2009

Nick Clegg says 'everything is vulnerable' as he prepares to ditch pledges on tuition fees and pensions

Nick Clegg will today jettison many of the Liberal Democrats' long-standing policy pledges in an attempt to convince voters they would make the deep spending cuts needed to fill the hole in the public finances.

In an interview with The Independent, Mr Clegg revealed that many of the promises cherished by his party will be downgraded from official policy to "aspirations" since there would be no money to fund them. They are expected to include flagship pledges to scrap university tuition fees, provide free personal care for the elderly, and bring in a higher basic state pension.

The Liberal Democrat leader will ask his party's conference in September to make firm commitments in just three areas at the general election: a boost for education, the creation of "green jobs", and constitutional reform. These themes will be set out today in a mini-manifesto, A Fresh Start for Britain, which could run into criticism at the Bournemouth conference from activists opposed to such a slimline programme.

Mr Clegg issued a wake-up call to a party which has traditionally had a long shopping list of policies but been less convincing about how it would pay for them. Such an approach was fine for "an era of plenty", he argued, but would no longer carry conviction in times of "austerity".

He announced two rules that will govern his party's policies: no spending commitments without cuts elsewhere to fund them, and, similarly, no promises of tax cuts without increases in other taxes.

Mr Clegg wants to kickstart a debate that he claims Labour and the Tories are denying the voters as they squabble over headline departmental budgets in a Whitehall-speak that leaves ordinary people cold. The first task, he insisted, was to set out the values which inform spending priorities.

"The circumstances are utterly different from anything in the last 15 years. Our shopping list of commitments will be far, far, far, far, far shorter," he said. "We will have to ask ourselves some immensely difficult questions about what we as a party can afford. A lot of cherished Lib Dem policies will have to go on the back burner. They will remain our aspirations. They will remain our policies. But we are not going to kid the British people into thinking we could deliver the full list of commitments we have put to them at the last three or four elections."

Asked if that meant watering down pledges on tuition fees, personal care and pensions, Mr Clegg replied: "Some of these might be retained as policies that we could not honestly place at the forefront of our manifesto because we could not honestly claim they could be delivered in the first few years of the next parliament.

"I hope people will understand these are aspirations we will maintain but that, in these completely different circumstances, you can't carry on promising the same menu of goodies. It is just not plausible."

The Liberal Democrat leader insisted he had not drawn up a hit list of policies to be dropped. "The blunt truth is that everything is vulnerable. All the aspirations remain. We are setting out the criteria by which the Lib Dems will pick and choose from that menu."

Could the NHS, protected by both Labour and the Tories, face cuts? In theory, yes, because no area would be immune. In practice, Mr Clegg admitted, he found it "almost impossible" to think his party would not maintain health spending.

Cutting pledges for pensioners could be a risky electoral strategy, since older people vote in greater numbers than other age groups. But he floated the idea of an "inter-generational deal" under which people agree to bring down the public deficit so that tomorrow's generation is not saddled with crippling debts. His party's "unique selling point" will be education. So his plans to bring in a "pupil premium" to steer state support to children from disadvantaged backgrounds and to cut class sizes are sacrosanct.

Mr Clegg admitted that his approach will require "discipline" from his party, but insisted that he was "not looking for a fight" at the September conference. He conceded that, if his broad approach is approved, then a lively debate and some squabbles would follow among his frontbenchers as they fought to maintain pledges in their areas.

Is he using the crisis in the public finances to change the image of a party which has sometimes behaved as if money grows on trees? He denied that such a correction is needed. "All parties need to fight the election in a very different set of financial circumstances. We have operated in a period of largesse, when it has been very easy to appear to be generous. We now have a huge structural deficit akin to having fought a major war. If we don't sort it, we risk further economic meltdown."

Some will suspect that his tough new line is driven by a desire not to be outflanked by the Tories, who have been more open about the need for spending cuts than Gordon Brown. Mr Clegg insisted he had not even thought about the point. He accused David Cameron of "economic illiteracy" by demanding cuts during the recession, and Mr Brown of being "in denial" about the need for them afterwards. "The choices politicians make must be based on values – not an arbitrary, axe-wielding approach to public spending or a dismal exchange between Gordon Brown and David Cameron about percentages that sounds like an argument between different book-keepers."




Lib Dems out of touch


• The Liberal Democrats are out of touch with Britain’s families and confused over Britain’s future. Their economic policy, such as it is, is made of up a series of failed
attempts to get attention – with expensive spending commitments one minute and promises of tax cuts the next. To pay for their pledges they have promised to cut tax
credits, abolish the Child Trust Fund, cut public services and introduce a new local income tax which would cost working families hundreds of pounds. The only place
where the Liberal Democrats don’t flip flop is crime and terrorism – still ideologically committed to soft punishments for criminals, putting up barriers to convicting the
guilty and introducing an amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Read on by clicking this PDF file

Liberal Democrats caught lying over Council Tax pledge

Leading Liberal Democrat Councillor, Andrew Wylie has tried to deflect constant criticism of Dorothy Thornhill's broken election promise to reduce ...

Read on........

Osborne's green sums don't add up - Cooper
YVETTE COOPER MP, Labour's Chief Secretary to the Treasury, responding to the admission in February by the Tories that George Osborne'...

Read on........

Getting fat on public money - Liberal Democrat style
January 2008 The Mayor was criticised in the Watford Observer for taking yet another pay rise whilst other council workers were losing the...

Read on........

Watford Council pays for Liberal Democrat propaganda
January 2008 A Liberal Democrat leaflet dropped through letterboxes in Oxhey at the end of January. It’s headline said, ‘Commuter Park...

Read on........

Mayor admits "Labour was right"
January 2008 Having failed to keep her election pledge to reduce Watford’s Council Tax to the Hertfordshire average, Dorothy Thornhill has be...

Read on........

Does the Mayor keep her promises?
January 2008 In the latest ‘Oxygen’ newletter from Watford Council, paid for by us the taxpayers, Dorothy Thornhill states brazenly, “Sin...

Read on........

If you would like to contact me with your queries or concerns, or make an appointment to see me.

Contact Me

For important locations around Claire's constituency please use the following link...

Map of Watford (Google)

 Go to Top of Page